|
The following are summaries from two books by Elton Trueblood. If
you've never heard of this man, Google
the name and prepare to be impressed. He taught at Stanford and Harvard,
among other places of learning,
was friend to presidents and other world leaders, and wrote dozens of excellent
books. And that was all before
lunch. He was an amazing man of God. Read below how Trueblood
defined the church universal, according
to his best understanding.
Excerpts from Alternatives to Futility, by Elton
Trueblood
The early Church turned the world upside down. No one would
accuse the Church of doing that today. The early
Church at first had no buildings, no separated clergy, no set ritual, no
bishops, no pope – yet it worked.
What are the characteristics of a church body
that might help us repeat the miracle?
A healthy church is a redemptive society that gives meaning to history and a
sense of human solidarity. Its members
grow in faith, encouraged by a special kind of fellowship that allows members to
recover a sense of meaning in
their lives. They live the truth of being linked to one another, and to
history, in the continuum of believers who
are in the flow of God’s eternal purpose.
This redemptive society is characterized by:
1. An intensive fellowship of
a. worship
b. affection
c. work
2. Members who have a sense of
a. Christ’s vocation
b. An emerging divine purpose
c. Their own vocations as followers of Jesus
3. Members who are dedicated
4. Members who are able to demonstrate rather than just theorize
5. A real sense of equality among the fellowship, in spite of different
functions
6. Fellowship that is marked by a sense of inner peace in the face of
the world’s turmoil
7. An almost boisterous, overwhelming joy in loving and serving God
8. The ability to maintain a cohesive fellowship, while introducing
ideas that are
discordant with society’s beliefs and practices
9. An ability to infect the surrounding community with the Gospel
10. Vitality
11. Moral sensitivity
12. Members set free from personal struggles for power, money, and prestige
13. There can be no living religion without a fellowship
14. Members feel responsible to one another
Millions who once
found their chief fellowship in the church, now find it in social groups, clubs,
hobbies, and so on.
Many of the best people are outside the churches precisely because
they are the best people. Becoming disgusted is
in their favor. There are churches that accomplish good, but there
are also many reasons to be discouraged.
Alienation is
often based on the fact that the church demands too little. What we need is a
redemptive movement
to take our dry bones and make them live – a reformation that
unites, that recovers and fulfills the radical nature of
Christianity. We need to be sufficiently bold and courageous in
creating these new redemptive societies (within
the established church, not outside it).
Important
questions to resolve:
Should we
distinguish between clergy and laity?
Should the Churches own property?
Should real membership be rigorously restricted to the deeply
convinced?
Should the normal meeting unit be the small cell rather than large
gatherings?
Should regular meals together be incorporated into the fellowship,
as was done in
the first century church?
Excerpts from The Company of the Committed, by Elton Trueblood
Pages 21-23
The crucial question today is not whether we must have a
fellowship, for on that point we are reasonably clear; the
crucial question concerns the character of the fellowship.
The more we think about it the more we realize that it must be
a fellowship of the committed. This is because mere belief is
never enough … the chief barrier to a renewed vitality in the
Christian society is not lack of belief. Millions … feel no sense
of urgency about the Christian endeavor …
One way of stating
the crucial difference between belief and commitment is to say that when
commitment occurs there
is attached to belief an ‘existential index’ which changes its
entire character. Belief in differs from belief that, in the way
in which the entire self is involved. ‘If I believe in something,’
says Marcel, ‘it means that I place myself at the disposal of
something, or again that I pledge myself fundamentally, and this
pledge affects not only what I have but also what I am.’
We shall not be saved by anything less than commitment and the
commitment will not be effective unless it finds expression
in a committed fellowship.
Page 38
What we seek is not a fellowship of the righteous or of the
self-righteous, but rather a fellowship of men and women who,
though they recognize that they are inadequate, nevertheless can be
personally involved in the effort to make Christ’s kingdom
prevail. Perhaps the greatest single weakness of the contemporary
Christian Church is that millions of supposed members are
not really involved at all and, what is worse, do not think it strange
that they are not. As soon as we recognize Christ’s intention
to make His Church a militant company we understand at once that the
conventional arrangement cannot suffice. There is no
real chance of victory in a campaign if ninety per cent of the soldiers
are untrained and uninvolved, but that is exactly where we
stand now.
Page 72
If we were to take the idea of a militant company seriously, the church
building would be primarily designed as a drill hall for
the Christian task force. It would be a place where Christian ambassadors
in common life would come together to be trained,
to strengthen one another, and to find solitude when it is needed … we may
say that the Christian building should be a ‘launching
pad,’ a place from which people engaged in secular life are propelled.
Page 99
The first Christians were sometimes divisive, sometimes snobbish,
sometimes deceitful, but they had no doubt concerning the
nature of the standard from which they were departing. It was the
standard of a loving concern for one another and for all men,
in the sense of a burning desire for the welfare of the other person.
Page 101
The evidence of love as the ultimate mark and test of the
(early) Christian community comes from many post-Biblical sources.
One of the most moving of all testimonies is Tertullian’s:
'It is
our care for the helpless, our practice of loving kindness, that brands us in
the eyes of many of our opponents.
‘Only look,’ they say, ‘look how they love one another … Look how they are
prepared to die for one another.’
Justin Martyr supplements this witness, in the conclusion of his
description of Christian worship, as follows:
'Those who are well-to-do and willing, give as they choose,
each as he himself purposes; the collection is then deposited
with the president, who
succors orphans, widows, those who are in want owing to sickness or any other
cause, those who
are in prison, and
strangers who are on a journey.'
Page 102
It must never be supposed that in a true Church the acceptance of responsibility
is limited to fellow members. Indeed, in all of the
great periods of vitality, the Church has been deeply concerned for the welfare
of those who are not adherents at all.
Page 108
At no point is the need of redemptive fellowship more pressing than in
connection with the problem of race … The poor maligned
society, the Church, really offers our best hope for the kind of ‘meeting’
without which the race question will not be solved at all.
Page 109
Trueblood calls for the formation of interracial fellowship groups [in 1961],
which he says can be revolutionary in their effect.
“In this way people who have lived for years in the same city as strangers, even
though employed in the same places, may become
actual friends. Their motto may be the
words of Christ when He said, ‘No longer do I call you servant …; but I have
called
you friends’ (John 15:15)."
| 
igure
out how to modify the navigation bars on this template, so "Product" is Webese
for "Here are the Alfa pix."O
